Malawi vs Tajikistan: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Malawi
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 20.07 1000 USD against 16.92 1000 USD in Malawi, a difference of 3.15 1000 USD.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Malawi ranks 143rd and Tajikistan ranks 142nd of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.76 1000 USD | 1.48 1000 USD | 0.72 1000 USD | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 19.53 1000 USD | 13.22 1000 USD | 6.31 1000 USD | Malawi |
| 2020s | 13.81 1000 USD | 34.58 1000 USD | 20.78 1000 USD | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Malawi or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 20.07 1000 USD against 16.92 1000 USD in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Malawi and Tajikistan?
- 3.15 1000 USD, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tajikistan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Tajikistan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Malawi ranks 143rd and Tajikistan ranks 142nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf