Mali vs Montenegro: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Mali
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 6.74 1000 USD against 5.82 1000 USD in Mali, a difference of 0.92 1000 USD.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 162nd and Montenegro ranks 159th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.04 1000 USD | 8.2 1000 USD | 3.83 1000 USD | Mali |
| 2010s | 4.18 1000 USD | 4.35 1000 USD | 0.17 1000 USD | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 5.82 1000 USD | 4.72 1000 USD | 1.1 1000 USD | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Mali or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 6.74 1000 USD against 5.82 1000 USD in Mali as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Mali and Montenegro?
- 0.92 1000 USD, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Montenegro?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Mali and Montenegro rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Mali ranks 162nd and Montenegro ranks 159th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf