Malta vs Mongolia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Malta
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 50.62 1000 USD against 45.39 1000 USD in Malta, a difference of 5.23 1000 USD.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 121st and Mongolia ranks 120th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.94 1000 USD | 14.96 1000 USD | 3.02 1000 USD | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 18.05 1000 USD | 16.01 1000 USD | 2.04 1000 USD | Malta |
| 2020s | 15.74 1000 USD | 35.91 1000 USD | 20.17 1000 USD | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Malta or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 50.62 1000 USD against 45.39 1000 USD in Malta as of 2022.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Malta and Mongolia?
- 5.23 1000 USD, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mongolia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Malta and Mongolia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Malta ranks 121st and Mongolia ranks 120th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf