Mauritania vs Seychelles: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Mauritania
- Seychelles
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 58.87 1000 USD against 56.07 1000 USD in Seychelles, a difference of 2.8 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Seychelles ahead.
Mauritania ranks 114th and Seychelles ranks 116th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.14 1000 USD | 9.98 1000 USD | 8.85 1000 USD | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 25.96 1000 USD | 26.49 1000 USD | 0.5333 1000 USD | Seychelles |
| 2020s | 83.65 1000 USD | 25.92 1000 USD | 57.73 1000 USD | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Mauritania or Seychelles?
- Mauritania, at 58.87 1000 USD against 56.07 1000 USD in Seychelles as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Mauritania and Seychelles?
- 2.8 1000 USD, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Seychelles?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Mauritania and Seychelles rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Mauritania ranks 114th and Seychelles ranks 116th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf