Mozambique vs Suriname: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Mozambique
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 35.98 1000 USD against 35.66 1000 USD in Mozambique, a difference of 0.32 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Suriname ahead.
Mozambique ranks 122nd and Suriname ranks 121st of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 374.99 1000 USD | 30.44 1000 USD | 344.56 1000 USD | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 10.9 1000 USD | 30.38 1000 USD | 19.48 1000 USD | Suriname |
| 2020s | 28.56 1000 USD | 26.05 1000 USD | 2.52 1000 USD | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Mozambique or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 35.98 1000 USD against 35.66 1000 USD in Mozambique as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Mozambique and Suriname?
- 0.32 1000 USD, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Suriname?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Mozambique and Suriname rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Mozambique ranks 122nd and Suriname ranks 121st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf