Myanmar vs Uganda: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Myanmar
- Uganda
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 113.26 1000 USD against 106.04 1000 USD in Uganda, a difference of 7.22 1000 USD.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 94th and Uganda ranks 95th of 189 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.11 1000 USD | 43.63 1000 USD | 31.52 1000 USD | Uganda |
| 2010s | 8.23 1000 USD | 80.44 1000 USD | 72.2 1000 USD | Uganda |
| 2020s | 69.48 1000 USD | 98.22 1000 USD | 28.73 1000 USD | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Myanmar or Uganda?
- Myanmar, at 113.26 1000 USD against 106.04 1000 USD in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Myanmar and Uganda?
- 7.22 1000 USD, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Uganda?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Myanmar and Uganda rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Myanmar ranks 94th and Uganda ranks 95th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf