New Caledonia vs Pakistan: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- New Caledonia
- Pakistan
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 153.33 1000 USD against 142.84 1000 USD in Pakistan, a difference of 10.49 1000 USD.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 79th and Pakistan ranks 82nd of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.54 1000 USD | 5.13 1000 USD | 1.59 1000 USD | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 85.84 1000 USD | 73.41 1000 USD | 12.44 1000 USD | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, New Caledonia or Pakistan?
- New Caledonia, at 153.33 1000 USD against 142.84 1000 USD in Pakistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between New Caledonia and Pakistan?
- 10.49 1000 USD, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Pakistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do New Caledonia and Pakistan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- New Caledonia ranks 79th and Pakistan ranks 82nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf