Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Zambia
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 63.5 1000 USD against 61.98 1000 USD in Zambia, a difference of 1.52 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Zambia ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 108th and Zambia ranks 109th of 189 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.96 1000 USD | 33.61 1000 USD | 4.64 1000 USD | Zambia |
| 2010s | 41.28 1000 USD | 44.95 1000 USD | 3.67 1000 USD | Zambia |
| 2020s | 45.21 1000 USD | 57.16 1000 USD | 11.95 1000 USD | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Papua New Guinea or Zambia?
- Papua New Guinea, at 63.5 1000 USD against 61.98 1000 USD in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
- 1.52 1000 USD, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Zambia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 108th and Zambia ranks 109th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf