Serbia vs Singapore: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Serbia
- Singapore
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 34,323 1000 USD against 27,486 1000 USD in Singapore, a difference of 6,837 1000 USD.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Singapore ahead.
Serbia ranks 30th and Singapore ranks 31st of 189 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,309 1000 USD | 5,445 1000 USD | 3,136 1000 USD | Singapore |
| 2010s | 5,931 1000 USD | 15,955 1000 USD | 10,024 1000 USD | Singapore |
| 2020s | 32,099 1000 USD | 36,759 1000 USD | 4,660 1000 USD | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Serbia or Singapore?
- Serbia, at 34,323 1000 USD against 27,486 1000 USD in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Serbia and Singapore?
- 6,837 1000 USD, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Singapore?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Singapore rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Serbia ranks 30th and Singapore ranks 31st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf