Tunisia vs Viet Nam: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Tunisia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 73,581 1000 USD against 60,590 1000 USD in Tunisia, a difference of 12,991 1000 USD.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Tunisia ahead.
Tunisia ranks 25th and Viet Nam ranks 23rd of 189 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tunisia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91,216 1000 USD | 16,265 1000 USD | 74,950 1000 USD | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 83,102 1000 USD | 50,454 1000 USD | 32,648 1000 USD | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 96,548 1000 USD | 72,462 1000 USD | 24,086 1000 USD | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Tunisia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 73,581 1000 USD against 60,590 1000 USD in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Tunisia and Viet Nam?
- 12,991 1000 USD, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Viet Nam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Tunisia and Viet Nam rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Tunisia ranks 25th and Viet Nam ranks 23rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf