Iceland vs Romania: Ammonia, anhydrous — Production

Iceland
0 t
in 2023
Romania
56,851 t
in 2023
Iceland rank
21st
Romania rank
18th

Ammonia, anhydrous — Production over time

  • Iceland
  • Romania
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M201320182023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 56,851 t against 0 t in Iceland, a difference of 56,851 t.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 21st and Romania ranks 18th of 35 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Romania Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 599,390 t 599,390 t Romania
2020s 0 t 347,961 t 347,961 t Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — production, Iceland or Romania?
Romania, at 56,851 t against 0 t in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — production between Iceland and Romania?
56,851 t, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Romania?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Romania rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — production?
Iceland ranks 21st and Romania ranks 18th of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ammonia, anhydrous — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
36 places, 349 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf