Cuba vs North Macedonia: Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Agricultural Use
Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Agricultural Use over time
- Cuba
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 38,286 t against 24,050 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 14,236 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.6 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Cuba ranks 32nd and North Macedonia ranks 35th of 95 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32,551 t | 20,666 t | 11,885 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 34,554 t | 23,908 t | 10,647 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium nitrate (an) — agricultural use, Cuba or North Macedonia?
- Cuba, at 38,286 t against 24,050 t in North Macedonia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in ammonium nitrate (an) — agricultural use between Cuba and North Macedonia?
- 14,236 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and North Macedonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Cuba and North Macedonia rank globally for ammonium nitrate (an) — agricultural use?
- Cuba ranks 32nd and North Macedonia ranks 35th of 95 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf