Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Ammonium nitrate (AN) β Agricultural Use
Ammonium nitrate (AN) β Agricultural Use over time
- Ecuador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 48,472 t against 42,823 t in Ecuador, a difference of 5,649 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 101 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37,265 t | 11,978 t | 25,288 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 59,350 t | 44,351 t | 15,000 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium nitrate (an) β agricultural use, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 48,472 t against 42,823 t in Ecuador as of 2011.
- What is the difference in ammonium nitrate (an) β agricultural use between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 5,649 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for ammonium nitrate (an) β agricultural use?
- Ecuador ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium nitrate (AN) β Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf