French Polynesia vs Slovenia: Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Agricultural Use
Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Agricultural Use over time
- French Polynesia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 94 t against 46 t in French Polynesia, a difference of 48 t.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 2.0 times French Polynesia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
French Polynesia ranks 83rd and Slovenia ranks 81st of 101 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.6 t | 2,823 t | 2,776 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 16.67 t | 813.33 t | 796.67 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 23 t | 143.33 t | 120.33 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium nitrate (an) — agricultural use, French Polynesia or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 94 t against 46 t in French Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium nitrate (an) — agricultural use between French Polynesia and Slovenia?
- 48 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Slovenia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do French Polynesia and Slovenia rank globally for ammonium nitrate (an) — agricultural use?
- French Polynesia ranks 83rd and Slovenia ranks 81st of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf