Cuba vs Slovenia: Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Export quantity

Cuba
60.2 t
in 2017
Slovenia
57.41 t
in 2024
Cuba rank
83rd
Slovenia rank
84th

Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Export quantity over time

  • Cuba
  • Slovenia
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k200420142024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 60.2 t against 57.41 t in Slovenia, a difference of 2.79 t.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 83rd and Slovenia ranks 84th of 102 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 3,405 t 76.76 t 3,328 t Cuba
2010s 2,874 t 144.27 t 2,730 t Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ammonium nitrate (an) — export quantity, Cuba or Slovenia?
Cuba, at 60.2 t against 57.41 t in Slovenia as of 2017.
What is the difference in ammonium nitrate (an) — export quantity between Cuba and Slovenia?
2.79 t, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Slovenia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2017.
How do Cuba and Slovenia rank globally for ammonium nitrate (an) — export quantity?
Cuba ranks 83rd and Slovenia ranks 84th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Export quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
133 places, 2,453 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf