Azerbaijan vs Luxembourg: Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Export value
Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Export value over time
- Azerbaijan
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 8.88 1000 USD against 8.66 1000 USD in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.22 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 93rd and Luxembourg ranks 92nd of 102 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 430.08 1000 USD | 1.36 1000 USD | 428.72 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 318.31 1000 USD | 11.47 1000 USD | 306.84 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 24.33 1000 USD | 9.78 1000 USD | 14.55 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium nitrate (an) — export value, Azerbaijan or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 8.88 1000 USD against 8.66 1000 USD in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium nitrate (an) — export value between Azerbaijan and Luxembourg?
- 0.22 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Luxembourg?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Luxembourg rank globally for ammonium nitrate (an) — export value?
- Azerbaijan ranks 93rd and Luxembourg ranks 92nd of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf