China, Hong Kong SAR vs Cuba: Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Export value
Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Export value over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Cuba
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 45.37 1000 USD against 42.51 1000 USD in Cuba, a difference of 2.86 1000 USD.
That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 79th and Cuba ranks 80th of 102 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 488.55 1000 USD | 2,668 1000 USD | 2,179 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2010s | 35.21 1000 USD | 2,617 1000 USD | 2,582 1000 USD | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium nitrate (an) — export value, China, Hong Kong SAR or Cuba?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 45.37 1000 USD against 42.51 1000 USD in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium nitrate (an) — export value between China, Hong Kong SAR and Cuba?
- 2.86 1000 USD, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Cuba?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Cuba rank globally for ammonium nitrate (an) — export value?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 79th and Cuba ranks 80th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf