Barbados vs Saint Lucia: Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import quantity
Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import quantity over time
- Barbados
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 64.15 t against 48.8 t in Barbados, a difference of 15.35 t.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.3 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 156th and Saint Lucia ranks 154th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 154.52 t | 20.39 t | 134.13 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 35.63 t | 52.97 t | 17.34 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 22.23 t | 64.15 t | 41.92 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium nitrate (an) — import quantity, Barbados or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 64.15 t against 48.8 t in Barbados as of 2020.
- What is the difference in ammonium nitrate (an) — import quantity between Barbados and Saint Lucia?
- 15.35 t, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Saint Lucia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Barbados and Saint Lucia rank globally for ammonium nitrate (an) — import quantity?
- Barbados ranks 156th and Saint Lucia ranks 154th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf