Congo vs Luxembourg: Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import quantity
Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import quantity over time
- Congo
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 1,865 t against 1,261 t in Congo, a difference of 604 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.5 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Congo ranks 113th and Luxembourg ranks 110th of 185 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 164.71 t | 5,287 t | 5,122 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 181.21 t | 1,469 t | 1,288 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 790.91 t | 1,098 t | 306.71 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium nitrate (an) — import quantity, Congo or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 1,865 t against 1,261 t in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium nitrate (an) — import quantity between Congo and Luxembourg?
- 604 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Luxembourg?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Luxembourg rank globally for ammonium nitrate (an) — import quantity?
- Congo ranks 113th and Luxembourg ranks 110th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf