Luxembourg vs Madagascar: Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import quantity
Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import quantity over time
- Luxembourg
- Madagascar
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 1,865 t against 1,370 t in Madagascar, a difference of 495 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.4 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 110th and Madagascar ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Madagascar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,013 t | 458.93 t | 2,554 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 1,469 t | 523.34 t | 945.94 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 1,098 t | 1,218 t | 120.06 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium nitrate (an) — import quantity, Luxembourg or Madagascar?
- Luxembourg, at 1,865 t against 1,370 t in Madagascar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium nitrate (an) — import quantity between Luxembourg and Madagascar?
- 495 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Madagascar?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Madagascar rank globally for ammonium nitrate (an) — import quantity?
- Luxembourg ranks 110th and Madagascar ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf