Namibia vs Papua New Guinea: Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import quantity
Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import quantity over time
- Namibia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 40,527 t against 39,631 t in Namibia, a difference of 896 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Namibia ranks 47th and Papua New Guinea ranks 45th of 185 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,252 t | 33,034 t | 31,782 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 19,221 t | 34,961 t | 15,740 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 25,737 t | 29,629 t | 3,891 t | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium nitrate (an) — import quantity, Namibia or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 40,527 t against 39,631 t in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium nitrate (an) — import quantity between Namibia and Papua New Guinea?
- 896 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Papua New Guinea?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for ammonium nitrate (an) — import quantity?
- Namibia ranks 47th and Papua New Guinea ranks 45th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf