Guinea-Bissau vs Myanmar: Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import value
Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import value over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 0.12 1000 USD against 0.05 1000 USD in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.07 1000 USD.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 2.4 times Guinea-Bissau's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Myanmar ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 182nd and Myanmar ranks 180th of 185 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.6 1000 USD | 1,268 1000 USD | 1,254 1000 USD | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 607.45 1000 USD | 404.01 1000 USD | 203.44 1000 USD | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium nitrate (an) — import value, Guinea-Bissau or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 0.12 1000 USD against 0.05 1000 USD in Guinea-Bissau as of 2018.
- What is the difference in ammonium nitrate (an) — import value between Guinea-Bissau and Myanmar?
- 0.07 1000 USD, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Myanmar?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Myanmar rank globally for ammonium nitrate (an) — import value?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 182nd and Myanmar ranks 180th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium nitrate (AN) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf