Argentina vs Estonia, Republic of: Ammonium sulphate β Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate β Agricultural Use over time
- Argentina
- Estonia, Republic of
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 20,558 t against 16,835 t in Estonia, Republic of, a difference of 3,723 t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.2 times Estonia, Republic of's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 39th and Estonia, Republic of ranks 41st of 97 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Estonia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64,696 t | 1,282 t | 63,413 t | Argentina |
| 2010s | 51,706 t | 10,242 t | 41,464 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate β agricultural use, Argentina or Estonia, Republic of?
- Argentina, at 20,558 t against 16,835 t in Estonia, Republic of as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate β agricultural use between Argentina and Estonia, Republic of?
- 3,723 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Estonia, Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Argentina and Estonia, Republic of rank globally for ammonium sulphate β agricultural use?
- Argentina ranks 39th and Estonia, Republic of ranks 41st of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate β Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf