Armenia vs North Macedonia: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- Armenia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 232 t against 186 t in Armenia, a difference of 46 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 79th and North Macedonia ranks 77th of 98 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24,290 t | 1,256 t | 23,034 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 4 t | 211 t | 207 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Armenia or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 232 t against 186 t in Armenia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Armenia and North Macedonia?
- 46 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and North Macedonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Armenia and North Macedonia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- Armenia ranks 79th and North Macedonia ranks 77th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf