Barbados vs Uganda: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- Barbados
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 795 t against 632 t in Barbados, a difference of 163 t.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.3 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 75th and Uganda ranks 74th of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 590.6 t | 130 t | 460.6 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 426.5 t | 1,561 t | 1,134 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Barbados or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 795 t against 632 t in Barbados as of 2011.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Barbados and Uganda?
- 163 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Uganda?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Barbados and Uganda rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- Barbados ranks 75th and Uganda ranks 74th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf