Canada vs Republic of Moldova: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- Canada
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Canada currently reports 882,000 t against 9,183 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 872,817 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 96.0 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 2nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 3rd of 98 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 915,000 t | 22 t | 914,978 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 869,295 t | 2,319 t | 866,976 t | Canada |
| 2020s | 880,000 t | 7,314 t | 872,686 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Canada or Republic of Moldova?
- Canada, at 882,000 t against 9,183 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Canada and Republic of Moldova?
- 872,817 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Republic of Moldova?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do Canada and Republic of Moldova rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- Canada ranks 2nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 3rd of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf