Colombia vs Nicaragua: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- Colombia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 41,094 t against 34,347 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 6,747 t.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 29th and Nicaragua ranks 30th of 98 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45,131 t | 9,547 t | 35,584 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 61,515 t | 17,805 t | 43,710 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 80,568 t | 73,177 t | 7,391 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Colombia or Nicaragua?
- Colombia, at 41,094 t against 34,347 t in Nicaragua as of 2022.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Colombia and Nicaragua?
- 6,747 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Nicaragua?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Colombia and Nicaragua rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- Colombia ranks 29th and Nicaragua ranks 30th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf