Dominican Republic vs Slovenia: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- Dominican Republic
- Slovenia
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 88 t against 85 t in Slovenia, a difference of 3 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 82nd and Slovenia ranks 83rd of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52,125 t | 351.25 t | 51,774 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 57,797 t | 1,804 t | 55,993 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 101.5 t | 1,220 t | 1,118 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Dominican Republic or Slovenia?
- Dominican Republic, at 88 t against 85 t in Slovenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Dominican Republic and Slovenia?
- 3 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Slovenia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Slovenia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- Dominican Republic ranks 82nd and Slovenia ranks 83rd of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf