Ecuador vs El Salvador: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 132,439 t against 118,406 t in El Salvador, a difference of 14,033 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was El Salvador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 13th and El Salvador ranks 14th of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16,604 t | 150,149 t | 133,545 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 57,198 t | 113,211 t | 56,014 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 119,214 t | 87,766 t | 31,448 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Ecuador or El Salvador?
- Ecuador, at 132,439 t against 118,406 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Ecuador and El Salvador?
- 14,033 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and El Salvador?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and El Salvador rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- Ecuador ranks 13th and El Salvador ranks 14th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf