Fiji vs Kenya: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use

Fiji
14,729 t
in 2011
Kenya
17,771 t
in 2021
Fiji rank
43rd
Kenya rank
41st

Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time

  • Fiji
  • Kenya
010.0k20.0k30.0k200220112021

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 17,771 t against 14,729 t in Fiji, a difference of 3,042 t.

That makes Kenya's figure about 1.2 times Fiji's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.

Fiji ranks 43rd and Kenya ranks 41st of 106 countries.

Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Kenya Difference Ahead
2000s 20,804 t 2,921 t 17,883 t Fiji
2010s 11,817 t 7,388 t 4,430 t Fiji

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Fiji or Kenya?
Kenya, at 17,771 t against 14,729 t in Fiji as of 2021.
What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Fiji and Kenya?
3,042 t, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Kenya?
8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Fiji and Kenya rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
Fiji ranks 43rd and Kenya ranks 41st of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
107 places, 1,310 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf