Indonesia vs Ukraine: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Indonesia
309,128 t
in 2022
Ukraine
300,623 t
in 2024
Indonesia rank
8th
Ukraine rank
9th
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- Indonesia
- Ukraine
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 309,128 t against 300,623 t in Ukraine, a difference of 8,505 t.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 8th and Ukraine ranks 9th of 97 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 676,686 t | 21,823 t | 654,863 t | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 928,756 t | 208,765 t | 719,991 t | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 534,316 t | 370,421 t | 163,895 t | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Indonesia or Ukraine?
- Indonesia, at 309,128 t against 300,623 t in Ukraine as of 2022.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Indonesia and Ukraine?
- 8,505 t, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Ukraine?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Indonesia and Ukraine rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- Indonesia ranks 8th and Ukraine ranks 9th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf