Ireland vs Luxembourg: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- Ireland
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 2,293 t against 943 t in Ireland, a difference of 1,350 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 2.4 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 64th and Luxembourg ranks 62nd of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,800 t | 3,795 t | 3,005 t | Ireland |
| 2010s | 17,918 t | 2,684 t | 15,235 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 2,078 t | 2,875 t | 797.6 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Ireland or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 2,293 t against 943 t in Ireland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Ireland and Luxembourg?
- 1,350 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Luxembourg?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Ireland and Luxembourg rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- Ireland ranks 64th and Luxembourg ranks 62nd of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf