Latvia vs Nicaragua: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- Latvia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 47,065 t against 34,347 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 12,718 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 27th and Nicaragua ranks 30th of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,066 t | 10,128 t | 3,062 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 30,398 t | 15,389 t | 15,010 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 35,897 t | 73,177 t | 37,280 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Latvia or Nicaragua?
- Latvia, at 47,065 t against 34,347 t in Nicaragua as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 12,718 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do Latvia and Nicaragua rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- Latvia ranks 27th and Nicaragua ranks 30th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf