Luxembourg vs Mauritius: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- Luxembourg
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 2,824 t against 2,293 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 531 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mauritius ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 68th and Mauritius ranks 67th of 106 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,795 t | 4,415 t | 620 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 2,684 t | 4,942 t | 2,259 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 2,875 t | 3,906 t | 1,031 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Luxembourg or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 2,824 t against 2,293 t in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 531 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Mauritius rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- Luxembourg ranks 68th and Mauritius ranks 67th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf