Malawi vs Uganda: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use

Malawi
821 t
in 2016
Uganda
795 t
in 2011
Malawi rank
72nd
Uganda rank
74th

Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time

  • Malawi
  • Uganda
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k200220092016

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 821 t against 795 t in Uganda, a difference of 26 t.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 72nd and Uganda ranks 74th of 106 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 10,059 t 127.33 t 9,932 t Malawi
2010s 17,394 t 1,561 t 15,832 t Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Malawi or Uganda?
Malawi, at 821 t against 795 t in Uganda as of 2016.
What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Malawi and Uganda?
26 t, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uganda?
8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Malawi and Uganda rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
Malawi ranks 72nd and Uganda ranks 74th of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
107 places, 1,310 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf