Malta vs North Macedonia, Republic of: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- Malta
- North Macedonia, Republic of
How they compare
North Macedonia, Republic of currently reports 232 t against 231 t in Malta, a difference of 1 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was North Macedonia, Republic of ahead.
Malta ranks 78th and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 77th of 97 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | North Macedonia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,292 t | 1,256 t | 36.25 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 432.5 t | 211 t | 221.5 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Malta or North Macedonia, Republic of?
- North Macedonia, Republic of, at 232 t against 231 t in Malta as of 2011.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Malta and North Macedonia, Republic of?
- 1 t, with North Macedonia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and North Macedonia, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Malta and North Macedonia, Republic of rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- Malta ranks 78th and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 77th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf