Namibia vs North Macedonia: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- Namibia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 338 t against 232 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 106 t.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.5 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Namibia ranks 82nd and North Macedonia ranks 84th of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 184 t | 1,601 t | 1,417 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 261 t | 211 t | 50 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Namibia or North Macedonia?
- Namibia, at 338 t against 232 t in North Macedonia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Namibia and North Macedonia?
- 106 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and North Macedonia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Namibia and North Macedonia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- Namibia ranks 82nd and North Macedonia ranks 84th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf