New Zealand vs Sri Lanka: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- New Zealand
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 81,208 t against 64,000 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 17,208 t.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
New Zealand ranks 20th and Sri Lanka ranks 22nd of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45,044 t | 61,649 t | 16,604 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 77,188 t | 38,585 t | 38,604 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 104,088 t | 71,355 t | 32,734 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, New Zealand or Sri Lanka?
- New Zealand, at 81,208 t against 64,000 t in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between New Zealand and Sri Lanka?
- 17,208 t, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sri Lanka?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do New Zealand and Sri Lanka rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- New Zealand ranks 20th and Sri Lanka ranks 22nd of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf