Philippines vs Thailand: Ammonium sulphate β Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate β Agricultural Use over time
- Philippines
- Thailand
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 554,591 t against 427,934 t in Thailand, a difference of 126,657 t.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.3 times Thailand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 5th and Thailand ranks 7th of 106 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 435,700 t | 228,341 t | 207,359 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 429,791 t | 313,356 t | 116,434 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 602,094 t | 596,768 t | 5,326 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate β agricultural use, Philippines or Thailand?
- Philippines, at 554,591 t against 427,934 t in Thailand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate β agricultural use between Philippines and Thailand?
- 126,657 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Thailand?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Philippines and Thailand rank globally for ammonium sulphate β agricultural use?
- Philippines ranks 5th and Thailand ranks 7th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate β Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf