Republic of Korea vs Tunisia: Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use
Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use over time
- Republic of Korea
- Tunisia
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 5,361 t against 3,547 t in Tunisia, a difference of 1,814 t.
That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.5 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 57th and Tunisia ranks 59th of 98 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16,542 t | 6,334 t | 10,208 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 9,983 t | 6,286 t | 3,697 t | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — agricultural use, Republic of Korea or Tunisia?
- Republic of Korea, at 5,361 t against 3,547 t in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — agricultural use between Republic of Korea and Tunisia?
- 1,814 t, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Tunisia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Republic of Korea and Tunisia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — agricultural use?
- Republic of Korea ranks 57th and Tunisia ranks 59th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf