Ecuador vs Saudi Arabia: Ammonium sulphate — Export quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Export quantity over time
- Ecuador
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 480 t against 456.62 t in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 23.38 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 68th and Saudi Arabia ranks 69th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 576.5 t | 375 t | 201.5 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 197.85 t | 751.79 t | 553.94 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 514.25 t | 2,690 t | 2,176 t | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export quantity, Ecuador or Saudi Arabia?
- Ecuador, at 480 t against 456.62 t in Saudi Arabia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export quantity between Ecuador and Saudi Arabia?
- 23.38 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Saudi Arabia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Saudi Arabia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export quantity?
- Ecuador ranks 68th and Saudi Arabia ranks 69th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf