Israel vs Papua New Guinea: Ammonium sulphate — Export quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Export quantity over time
- Israel
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Israel currently reports 14 t against 13.12 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.88 t.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Israel ranks 88th and Papua New Guinea ranks 89th of 105 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.8 t | 1,000 t | 920.2 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 3,120 t | 6.18 t | 3,114 t | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export quantity, Israel or Papua New Guinea?
- Israel, at 14 t against 13.12 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export quantity between Israel and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.88 t, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Papua New Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Israel and Papua New Guinea rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export quantity?
- Israel ranks 88th and Papua New Guinea ranks 89th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf