Latvia vs South Africa: Ammonium sulphate — Export quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Export quantity over time
- Latvia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 24,590 t against 21,621 t in Latvia, a difference of 2,969 t.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was South Africa ahead.
Latvia ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 24th of 105 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,001 t | 13,650 t | 11,649 t | South Africa |
| 2010s | 8,110 t | 11,022 t | 2,911 t | South Africa |
| 2020s | 17,966 t | 21,659 t | 3,693 t | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export quantity, Latvia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 24,590 t against 21,621 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export quantity between Latvia and South Africa?
- 2,969 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and South Africa?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and South Africa rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export quantity?
- Latvia ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 24th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf