Singapore vs South Africa: Ammonium sulphate — Export quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Export quantity over time
- Singapore
- South Africa
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 35,305 t against 24,590 t in South Africa, a difference of 10,715 t.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.4 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was South Africa ahead.
Singapore ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 21st of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 168.53 t | 14,439 t | 14,271 t | South Africa |
| 2010s | 28,351 t | 11,022 t | 17,329 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 39,650 t | 21,659 t | 17,991 t | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export quantity, Singapore or South Africa?
- Singapore, at 35,305 t against 24,590 t in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export quantity between Singapore and South Africa?
- 10,715 t, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Singapore and South Africa rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export quantity?
- Singapore ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 21st of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf