Australia vs Colombia: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Australia
- Colombia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 22.96 1000 USD against 19.88 1000 USD in Colombia, a difference of 3.08 1000 USD.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 84th and Colombia ranks 86th of 105 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,652 1000 USD | 315.18 1000 USD | 12,337 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2010s | 9,331 1000 USD | 199.66 1000 USD | 9,132 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2020s | 3,659 1000 USD | 165.11 1000 USD | 3,494 1000 USD | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Australia or Colombia?
- Australia, at 22.96 1000 USD against 19.88 1000 USD in Colombia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Australia and Colombia?
- 3.08 1000 USD, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Colombia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Colombia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Australia ranks 84th and Colombia ranks 86th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf