Belarus vs Uzbekistan: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Belarus
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 1,136 1000 USD against 826.27 1000 USD in Belarus, a difference of 309.73 1000 USD.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.4 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 43rd and Uzbekistan ranks 41st of 105 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18,819 1000 USD | 2,564 1000 USD | 16,255 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 34,374 1000 USD | 3,719 1000 USD | 30,655 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2020s | 14,648 1000 USD | 4,350 1000 USD | 10,298 1000 USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Belarus or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 1,136 1000 USD against 826.27 1000 USD in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Belarus and Uzbekistan?
- 309.73 1000 USD, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uzbekistan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Uzbekistan rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Belarus ranks 43rd and Uzbekistan ranks 41st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf