Costa Rica vs Kenya: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Costa Rica
- Kenya
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 182.35 1000 USD against 148.78 1000 USD in Kenya, a difference of 33.57 1000 USD.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 61st and Kenya ranks 63rd of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.91 1000 USD | 102.97 1000 USD | 61.06 1000 USD | Kenya |
| 2010s | 244.95 1000 USD | 218.08 1000 USD | 26.87 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 383.96 1000 USD | 134.77 1000 USD | 249.19 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Costa Rica or Kenya?
- Costa Rica, at 182.35 1000 USD against 148.78 1000 USD in Kenya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Costa Rica and Kenya?
- 33.57 1000 USD, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kenya?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Kenya rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Costa Rica ranks 61st and Kenya ranks 63rd of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf