Croatia vs Indonesia: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Croatia
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 4,338 1000 USD against 3,266 1000 USD in Croatia, a difference of 1,072 1000 USD.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.3 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 29th and Indonesia ranks 26th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Indonesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.36 1000 USD | 302.31 1000 USD | 298.95 1000 USD | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 4,379 1000 USD | 2,017 1000 USD | 2,362 1000 USD | Croatia |
| 2020s | 11,978 1000 USD | 1,118 1000 USD | 10,859 1000 USD | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Croatia or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 4,338 1000 USD against 3,266 1000 USD in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Croatia and Indonesia?
- 1,072 1000 USD, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Indonesia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Indonesia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Croatia ranks 29th and Indonesia ranks 26th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf