Czechia vs Lithuania: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Czechia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 9,687 1000 USD against 9,000 1000 USD in Lithuania, a difference of 687 1000 USD.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 19th and Lithuania ranks 20th of 105 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13,403 1000 USD | 674.15 1000 USD | 12,729 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2010s | 21,296 1000 USD | 15,648 1000 USD | 5,648 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2020s | 19,317 1000 USD | 14,046 1000 USD | 5,271 1000 USD | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Czechia or Lithuania?
- Czechia, at 9,687 1000 USD against 9,000 1000 USD in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Czechia and Lithuania?
- 687 1000 USD, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Lithuania?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Lithuania rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Czechia ranks 19th and Lithuania ranks 20th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf