Ecuador vs Sweden: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Ecuador
- Sweden
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 144.68 1000 USD against 136.08 1000 USD in Sweden, a difference of 8.6 1000 USD.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Sweden ahead.
Ecuador ranks 70th and Sweden ranks 71st of 105 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 183.53 1000 USD | 972.85 1000 USD | 789.32 1000 USD | Sweden |
| 2010s | 48.38 1000 USD | 765.67 1000 USD | 717.29 1000 USD | Sweden |
| 2020s | 174.62 1000 USD | 188.17 1000 USD | 13.55 1000 USD | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Ecuador or Sweden?
- Ecuador, at 144.68 1000 USD against 136.08 1000 USD in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Ecuador and Sweden?
- 8.6 1000 USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Sweden rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Ecuador ranks 70th and Sweden ranks 71st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf